Thursday, April 12, 2012

Pure by Julianna Baggott: Review

Pure Julianna Baggott
Pure
By: Julianna Baggott
Review by: Kylie Comfoltey

The world has been destroyed in a nuclear war. The Detonations have fused people with pieces of The Before: metal, wood, glass, plastic, other people; even earth and stone. There are two groups of people left: wretches and Pure. The Pure live a 'healthy' life in the Dome, and the wretches suffer life outside breathing ash, running from creatures and fellow humans alike, and eating anything deemed semi-edible--all the while holding onto the hope that someday, those in the Dome will come to their aid.

I’m having a hard time with this one. I liked this book, but parts of it were a touch too weird for me. All the marketing hype portrayed it as “The Next Hunger Games;” I expected a more realistic post-apocalyptic/dystopian nightmare readers can dive into and imagine living. That was not my experience. The Hunger Games series is more believable and, frankly, less creepy. It is relatable for people of all ages. People aren’t fused with gears and glass. They don’t have infants melded to their biceps or brothers or birds attached to their backs.

I didn’t get into this book until maybe halfway through. The last quarter is fast-paced and action-packed, but the first half (at least) is slow and a little too descriptive for my taste. The author clearly spent a lot of time envisioning this world and wanted the reader to fully understand and grasp the atmosphere and living circumstances of the wretches vs. the Pures, but a huge chunk of the book felt more concentrated on description and violence than plot and character development, which is more my thing.

There are two main protagonists. Pressia, a wretch; and Partride, a Pure. On one arm, Pressia sports a doll head fist instead of a hand. She had been holding the doll when the Detonations struck, and it became a part of her. The doll head plays a part in the story, but I’m still not feeling like, “Oh, that seems normal. It just replaced her hand. That happens.”

The romances in the book are incredibly weak. Particularly Partridge’s. It seems almost like the author created a faux romance out of desperation to add more depth to the story, or maybe just to add another character's viewpoint. Perhaps that character has a stronger part in forthcoming books? Pressia’s romance story comes together better at the end, but there is very little buildup. Then again, I don't think Baggott was going for romance to be a major factor.

Overall: I am intrigued. I want to read the rest of the story. I’m unsettled and a little weirded out, and this review sounds more negative than I meant it to (I'm giving it four stars, people!), but I liked the character development when it was there and I’m hoping for more of that to overshine the Groupies and Dusts in books to come. Pure is not a book everyone and their mother/sibling/teacher/doctor will be comfortable reading. But try it: if you like it, you'll really like it!

        

Sexuality: Small references. Mild overall.
Drugs/Alcohol: Mild
Profanity: Mild
Violence: Medium to heavy at parts. Baggott is very descriptive.


8 comments:

  1. I haven't heard of this before, but it sounds really weird. They really use a doll's head for a hand? I probably won't pick this one up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, there is a doll's head as a hand! I accepted that the story was not a realistic one I could imagine myself into, so I got over the weirdness and powered through it. Now I feel like I need to find out what happens!

      By the way, I just finished a book called Unspoken (by Sarah Rees Brennan). The main's name is Kami! The review won't be out until near September, but watch for it--I loved it!!

      Delete
  2. Aw, I really loved this one, but we all have different tastes. I think for me The Hunger Games comparison comes from how unique it is and the social issues it addresses and the world building rather than having other things in common.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really did like it, Amy! I agree with you on the reasons for the Hunger Games comparison. Pure was more out of my norm than I expected, and like I said--the review reads more negatively than I wanted it to. I'll be waiting right along with you for the next book!

      Delete
  3. I have a galley of this that I've been putting off. I've started and stopped a dozen times. I'm just so squeamish about all the odd fusing stuff. I'm still deciding what to do about it.

    Hearing that it's a 4 star for you, even with the weirdness, may tip the scales in favor of reading it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, that is great to hear. Try reading it again! I don't want my review to scare people off! This book wasn't entirely in my comfort zone, hence the less-than-raving review, but the story hooked me once I got over the fusings. If you do read it, I want your final opinion!

      Delete
  4. I've just heard too many mixed reviews about this one. It sounds way too weird!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's weird, Jenny, but it is also interesting. I liked the characters! Out of my norm, I guess.

      Delete

Thank you for your comment! I always respond to comments, so check back later, or subscribe to the comment feed.